CHEST Guidelines-Assessment of Intervention Fidelity and Recommendations for Researchers Conducting Studies on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Cough in the Adult

Assessment of Intervention Fidelity and Recommendations for Researchers Conducting Studies on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Cough in the Adult

Back to course

Pdf Summary

The article titled "Assessment of Intervention Fidelity and Recommendations for Researchers Conducting Studies on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Cough in Adults" by Cynthia T. French, Rebecca L. Diekemper, and Richard S. Irwin, published in "CHEST" in July 2015, centers on inconsistencies in managing chronic cough due to a lack of adherence to intervention fidelity in research studies. Intervention fidelity refers to the degree to which interventions are implemented as planned.<br /><br />The authors performed a systematic review, analyzing 23 studies involving 3,636 patients, focusing on intervention fidelity in diagnosing and managing chronic cough. The article outlines a method to assess intervention fidelity across five areas: study design, provider training, delivery of treatment, receipt of treatment, and treatment enactment.<br /><br />Key findings indicated that intervention fidelity was generally poor, averaging a score of 20.74 out of 48 across the studies. The review highlights inadequate training for providers, lack of consistent guidelines, and insufficient patient engagement metrics.<br /><br />As a result of these findings, the authors recommend that future studies on chronic cough should incorporate intervention fidelity at each phase—study design, provider training, treatment delivery, patient understanding, and adherence. They advocate for a standardized use of intervention manuals and emphasize the need for assessing patient understanding and engagement within the study design to enhance treatment outcomes.<br /><br />The review suggests that failure to maintain intervention fidelity might contribute to the variability in chronic cough treatment success reported in literature. Following the outlined recommendations could enhance study reliability and validity, ultimately improving guideline-based clinical practice and patient outcomes.<br /><br />Overall, the article stresses the importance of robust methodological frameworks in research to ensure high-quality, generalizable findings that can inform effective clinical practice guidelines for managing chronic cough.

Keywords

chronic cough

intervention fidelity

systematic review

study design

provider training

treatment delivery

patient engagement

research methodology

clinical practice guidelines

treatment outcomes