false
OasisLMS
Catalog
CHEST Guidelines
COUNTERPOINT--Should-Patients-With-Advanced-Lung-D ...
COUNTERPOINT--Should-Patients-With-Advanced-Lung-D (1)
Back to course
Pdf Summary
The discussion centers around the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplantation for patients with advanced lung disease who have not yet been listed for transplant. Drs. Whitney Warren, Robert Walter, and Phillip Mason argue against offering ECMO to these patients, pointing out several concerns.<br /><br />Firstly, they highlight that ECMO outcomes are significantly better in high-volume centers with extensive experience and caution that other centers may have poorer outcomes, evidenced by lower 1-year survival rates. Many transplant centers perform fewer than 35 transplants annually, suggesting that most facilities do not have the requisite experience to effectively use ECMO as a bridge.<br /><br />Secondly, they raise the "bridge to nowhere" concern, where patients who are not yet listed for transplant may be sustained by ECMO without ever receiving a transplant, leading to ethical and emotional dilemmas. Once patients are on ECMO and not considered candidates for transplantation, decision-making about discontinuing ECMO can become ethically complicated and emotionally taxing for medical staff and families alike.<br /><br />Moreover, they consider the potential impact on patient assessment, worrying that emotional bonds formed with ECMO patients could lead to biased listing decisions, which might skew organ allocation priorities and patient outcomes.<br /><br />In contrast, Ms. Gannon and Drs. Stokes and Bacchetta acknowledge these challenges but argue that with standardized decision pathways and a thoughtful care approach, ECMO can be offered in certain circumstances. They emphasize that avoiding ECMO due to potential ethical issues may not do justice to patients who might benefit from advanced therapies. They assert that emotional bonds should not prevent teams from making objective decisions, as transplant candidacy is determined through collective decision-making, not individual preference.<br /><br />Overall, the consensus is cautious about widespread use of ECMO for patients not yet listed for transplant, advocating for its use primarily at centers with sufficient experience and resources.
Keywords
ECMO
lung transplantation
advanced lung disease
high-volume centers
ethical dilemmas
patient outcomes
organ allocation
standardized decision pathways
transplant candidacy
collective decision-making
×
Please select your language
1
English